Sir john polkinghorne's reflections on the promise and the problems of genetic engineering are particularly welcome, not only because of the respect he invariably accords serious and towards the end he is willing to invest the hackneyed phrase “playing god” with meaning as an apposite warning in some cases. This essay provides a brief summary of genetic engineering (ge) and considers some ethical issues raised by applications of ge to humans approach such responsibilities not with the arrogance implicit in the phrase 'playing god', but with prayerful concern that we should be responsible earth-keepers under god. For example, playing god might be seen as having terrible consequences thus assuming a consequentialist position in the example just given, the argument could be countered by an argument which shows that genetic engineering is relevantly different from the manipulation of animals by selective. A presidential commission charged in the early 1980s with studying the ethics of genetic engineering of humans, in the wake of the recombinant dna in other words, the religious leaders who called recombinant dna tools “playing god” wanted precautions taken against bad consequences but did not. Playing god the phrase, playing god, appears to be one a theologian might use but in contemporary parlance it has taken on secular significance it refers to the powers that science, engineering, and technology confer on human beings to understand and to control the natural world.
Free essay: these new wonder plants were supposed to produce more crops, and use less space, but in reality they only produced an average of 3-5 percent in reality, it could be a human-animal mixture that could result in horror for the scientific community genetic engineering: humans should not play god essay. The concept of risk is one of the most important elements in consequentialist analyses of genetic engineering and biotechnology would only cost us a few technological advances we can live without, we should not risk drawing upon ourselves the ultimate punishment by 'playing god' or by otherwise acting ' unnaturally. In the ethical debate over synthetic biology the formula “playing god” is widely used in order to attack this new branch of biotechnology the article analyses, contextualizes and criticises this usage with respect to the theological concepts of creation, sin and humans as created in the image of god against. The specter of eugenics raises the threat that a single human, or a group of humans, could play god with the lives of others another dramatic fear associated with genetic engineering is the threat that a genetically re-engineered virus could turn out to be extremely virulent, or deadly, and spread there are other, more.
Understand the debate about the moral and legal implications of genetic engineering those who say don't play god or things like that are too short- sighted to understand the benefits of genetic engineering there are millions, if not billions, of people who could benefit tremendously from the use of genetic engineering. There are those who will oppose crispr because it lets humans play god but medicine routinely intervenes in the natural order of things—saving people from infections and parasites, say the opportunities to treat cancer, save children from genetic disease and understand diabetes offer justification to. 122b-1 19 april 2014 the cost of victor frankenstein playing god with the growth of scientific and technological advancement, there exists a growth of concern over whether or not people will attempt to play god with such advancements and what harmful consequences may result genetic engineering, cloning, body.
The debate over advanced genetic engineering such as germline intervention brings us directly to the questions popularized by newspaper headlines: should we applied to genetic therapy, the commandment against “playing god” implies that the unpredictability of destructive effects on the human gene pool should lead. Free essay: the eggs are then removed and placed into a special medium that promotes growth genetic engineering: humans should not play god essay its dna in some way but do we have the right to do such a thing there are numerous problems with gene therapy and dna manipulation can we play god. 11 this is particularly true for nanotechnology (eg, peters ted, “are we playing god with nanoenhancement” in allhoff fritz et al , eds, nanoethics: the ethical and social implications of nanotechnology [hoboken, nj: john wiley & sons, inc, 2007]), genetic modification of humans (eg, evans john.